Debate of the Century

A question has arisen over the last decade or so, that has finally reached a point where I believe we must finally put an end to it, once and for all. We must finally look at this argument in-depth, give it the proper due diligence it deserves, and put it to rest.

So, with all that said, let’s discuss the greatest debate of our time: “Rules-Lite vs. Crunchy Tabletop Roleplaying Games”.

It’s Rules-Lite that wins, there’s no question here. People who need rules to determine every single aspect of a game just lack creativity and imagination. Rules-Lite games allow the GameMaster to adjudicate issues on the fly, as needed, without having to rely on finding some obscure rule in a book.

It. Just. Works.

Anyway, that’s about it.

Oh, hey… By the way! I’m working on a rules-lite RPG right now, based upon a system I devised a couple of decades ago. Basically just streamlining the old game down a bunch, and seeing where it goes. Yes, this puts my PbtA-based game on Hold for a bit, but I’m feeling really inspired by certain new games like “Eldritch Hack”, so I’m doing this now.

Regardless, I’m still right.

I'm the editor, publisher, and primary "talent" here at

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.